Jump to content

BA's 2008 Draft Report Card : Best Tools


Recommended Posts

I personally struggle with the 'athlete' concept. This implies that someone has incredible athletic skills (ie: speed, strength, leaping ability) but not necessarily baseball skills.

I like the fact that Avery is mentioned, but a fast bad hitter, is no better than a slow bad hitter, aside from being a qualified MiL pinch runner.

Hopefully, Avery's bat develops.

Here's where you and Frobby are missing the boat when you hear "athlete." We're not talking about guys with no baseball backgrounds. We're talking about guys who the scouts have seen play baseball but they've come from areas where their baseball programs may not be very good or they've never fully committed to baseball because they were so good at other sports.

In Avery's case, he's played in showcase games with the best high school talent around (and hit a long home run in one game to boot) but he's a great athlete to boot. It's not like Joe Jordan and his scouts are scouring football and lacrosse fields looking for raw athletic players and trying to make them baseball players.

Jordan calls his preference, "Athletes who are baseball players." In other words, he's already seen them play the game of baseball well, but thinks if they focus solely on baseball, they will improve incrementally. He believes these kind of guys need 1000 professional at bats before you really know where they are heading, but he's a firm believer that in the end, you will end up with more successes than drafting thick-bodied "pure" baseball players, who may hit a bit, but will probably end up 1B/DH types.

Most players drafted are going to fail to reach the majors in any significant role, that's just the odds. But the one thing to take out of all of this that Jordan may like "athletes", but they are baseball players, not just raw athletic young men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going to post something similar to what Tony just did.

I think people are going in thought directions that are not appropriate with Avery just because someone said he was an athlete.

I would also like to point out that Tyler Henson was an "athlete" when drafted - having taken both his baseball and football (he played quarterback) teams to the state championships - and winning. The BA write-up on Henson had positive vibes about most aspects of Tyler's game save for his hitting - as his swing had some doubters.

Now, we see Tyler show some decent stuff at DelMarva, we see some major progress in his plate discipline this winter, and he appears ready for a quality season at Frederick next year to improve his prospect status.

The term "athlete" should not carry such a negative connotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's where you and Frobby are missing the boat when you hear "athlete." We're not talking about guys with no baseball backgrounds. We're talking about guys who the scouts have seen play baseball but they've come from areas where their baseball programs may not be very good or they've never fully committed to baseball because they were so good at other sports.

Where did I miss the boat? I thought that's what I was saying here:

It depends a little bit on what kind of opportunity he has had to develop baseball skills. If you are 18 years old, and grew up in a family with limited resources in an area where there isn't much top-flight baseball competition around, chances are your baseball skills aren't very well developed. But that doesn't mean you can't learn them when you are being paid to focus on it and getting high level professional instruction.

When I said "chances are your baseball skills aren't very well developed," I didn't mean the player hadn't played at all. I meant pretty much the same thing you just said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's where you and Frobby are missing the boat when you hear "athlete." We're not talking about guys with no baseball backgrounds. We're talking about guys who the scouts have seen play baseball but they've come from areas where their baseball programs may not be very good or they've never fully committed to baseball because they were so good at other sports.

In Avery's case, he's played in showcase games with the best high school talent around (and hit a long home run in one game to boot) but he's a great athlete to boot. It's not like Joe Jordan and his scouts are scouring football and lacrosse fields looking for raw athletic players and trying to make them baseball players.

Jordan calls his preference, "Athletes who are baseball players." In other words, he's already seen them play the game of baseball well, but thinks if they focus solely on baseball, they will improve incrementally. He believes these kind of guys need 1000 professional at bats before you really know where they are heading, but he's a firm believer that in the end, you will end up with more successes than drafting thick-bodied "pure" baseball players, who may hit a bit, but will probably end up 1B/DH types.

Most players drafted are going to fail to reach the majors in any significant role, that's just the odds. But the one thing to take out of all of this that Jordan may like "athletes", but they are baseball players, not just raw athletic young men.

I'm not saying Avery won't be a great pick. I just struggle with labeling someone a great athlete. I much prefer great athletes who are great ballplayers. I hope Avery is every bit of that, believe me! I just think this is where we start looking at the org development effectiveness for some hope in making great athletes into great ML ballplayers.

Go O's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Kimbrel’s getting a lot of save chances.   In addition to his 12 saves and 3 blown saves, there were two other games where he was brought in for the save but Hyde had to pull the plug on him.  In one, Cano bailed him out and got the save.   In the other, Akin allowed the tying run that Kimbrel had put on base to score, so Akin rather than Kimbrel got the blown save even though Kimbrel was really the one who created the situation.  The O’s won that game anyway but it took three extra innings and a lot of drama.   So really, Kimbrel’s had 17 chances to earn a save, and converted 12.   Not very good, but he seems to have emerged from his rough patch and hopefully will be effective for a while.    
    • They know that if they start doing that he'll start swinging at more of them, and when he's put the first pitch in play over his career he's batting .314 with an .895 OPS. Although that's actually just seven points of OPS higher than the MLB average.
    • Does the “27th man” demotion count as an option?
    • With two strikes the league OPSes hits .168/.246/.258 with a .504 OPS. So either .654 or .547 he's doing better in those situations than most batters. Since the start of 2023 he's 34th in MLB in two-strike OPS out of 300 batters with 100+ PAs in those situations. Our old friend DJ Stewart is 17-for-126 with 78 Ks and a .465 OPS when batting with two strikes. Elly De La Cruz is OPSing .471 with two strikes, with 215 strikeouts in 373 PAs.
    • I’m a proud Orioles fan and a proud ketchup-on-hot-dog guy!  😂
    • Who goes for the new guy today?  Gotta be one of Vespi, Akin, or Tate?  I’m guessing Vespi. Although, I wouldn’t be surprised if we did a load management move with Akin. He’s pitched a lot so far. On pace for like 90 IP.  Also, keep in mind that this would be Vespi’s fourth time being optioned this year, and I think a player can only be optioned five times. After 5 times in one season they have to be DFA’d to be assigned to the minors. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...